Lioness poster

Lioness

· · ★ 8.0

Directed by
Taylor Sheridan
Starring
Zoe Saldaña as Joe McNamara, Laysla De Oliveira as Cruz Manuelos, Dave Annable as Neal McNamara, Jill Wagner as Bobby, LaMonica Garrett as Tucker
Critics
Rotten Tomatoes 56% · Metacritic 56/100
  • central intelligence agency (cia)
  • undercover agent
  • biting
  • us military
  • special ops
  • thoughtful
  • spy thriller
  • suspenseful
Download Pikashow

Lioness is a technically polished but ideologically polarizing espionage drama

This show is worth watching if you like \”high-end\” production value and visceral kinetic action rather than narrative subtleties. The show succeeds as a slick and suspenseful genre exercise, but it is a divisive entry in the espionage canon because it attempts to balance a lot of its technical ambition with a lot of over dramatic political commentary.

Visual Dynamism Meets Scripted Stasis

***Showtime’s espionage thriller is a series too, but with improved filming systems than most series. Authoring the shots is Paul Cameron and his efforts are exemplary. He avoids scriveners’ straight jacket and brings us skewed views, distances, and changed focuses. Watching the dialogues is fishy and his work brings a sense of urgency to what could been understood as calm. Marcus Bellas and Miranda de Pencier attempted out of series thinking, but with respect, were unsuccessful efforts. The script fails to keep steady parallelism with the unorthodox visuals.**

***The promises of series’ liberalism and dialogues’ freedom and in all circumstances remaining faithful to the unorthodox shooting means they will remain rarely used. Be a little more civil. The conversations and the cynicism and didactic assumptions of distracted viewers work adversely. The looseness reminds of uninformed, unqualified military exercises, not a tightly woven fabric of character exploration tracing the psyche of intelligence work.’***

A Tale of Two Performances

The physical and emotional intensity from Zoe Saldaña and Laysla De Oliveira keeps the more melodramatic plot lines from falling apart. Their dedication to the roles of handler and operative give the show its one, steady emotional pulse.

However, the rest of the cast has a more significant challenge in terms of building their characters. Some performances are hindered by jarring, distracting cosmetic decisions that take the audience out of the story, while others are handicapped by a script that appears to be oblivious to the depth of its female characters.

Who Should Engage with the Mission

The show has been created specifically for people who enjoy big-budget thrillers featuring military technology and tactical realism. Enjoying a show that acts as a dark, textured action piece should help you find enough to watch through the first season.

Those looking for a rational, politically neutral critique on global interventionism will need to look further. Those who are bothered by the glorification of military exceptionalism will find the series to be more of a frustrating propaganda exercise than a gripping drama.

What works

  • Dynamic and unconventional cinematography
  • Strong, committed lead performances
  • High production values and tactical realism

What falls short

  • Derivative and often unconvincing plot beats
  • Heavy-handed approach to political themes
  • Inconsistent character development

What critics said

“Zoe Saldaña provides the energy of a Lioness, but these Special Ops are largely derivative and unconvincing.”

— Critics consensus, Rotten Tomatoes

“In Cameron's hands, even a standard dialogue scene between two actors has extra dynamism and energy that come simply from looking for unorthodox angles.”

— Jim Hemphill, IndieWire

“Sheridan found a form, the action thriller, that suits him better than the western soap operas and contemporary crime dramas that he has produced up to now.”

— Mike Hale, The New York Times

Quotes via Wikipedia

Leave a Reply

Your rating

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *